Abstract

Experimental solid mechanics is at a pivotal point where machine learning (ML) approaches are rapidly proliferating into the discovery process due to significant advances in data storage and processing capabilities. Much of the ML that is being adopted by the mechanics community was initially developed for application outside of science and engineering, and has the potential to produce results of questionable physical validity. To ensure that these data-driven approaches are trustworthy, there is a clear need to embed physical principles into their architectures, to evaluate and compare ML frameworks against benchmark datasets, and to test their broader extensibility. Frameworks must be grounded in a clear objective, quantifiable error, and a well-defined scope of extensibility. These principles enable ML models with a wide range of architectures to be meaningfully categorized, compared, evaluated, and extended to broader experimental and computational frameworks. Application of these principles are demonstrated through an investigation of ML models in two different use cases, acoustic emission and resonant ultrasound spectroscopy, along with a discussion of outlooks for the future of trustworthy ML in experimental mechanics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.