Abstract
According to Zagaria et al. (2020), evolutionary psychology may be the meta-theory that is needed if psychological science is to enter a paradigmatic stage. Other writers have suggested that what is needed is a person-oriented approach, which focuses on the person as a complex system that needs to be studied (1) as a whole (holism), (2) as an intentional agent in interaction with its environment (interactionism), and (3) in terms of his or her individual characteristics and development (idiographic focus). The purpose of the present paper is to discuss the compatibility of these two suggestions. A brief analysis of some formulations central to Dawkins’ gene-centered approach (e.g., “the intricate interdependence of genes”, and the dependence of genes on their environment) suggests that it is quite compatible with holism and interactionism; and applications such as genetic genealogy illustrate the possibility of a person-oriented genetics. It is argued that these two perspectives are not only compatible, but also complementary. Without a complement in the form of a person-oriented perspective, a gene-centered evolutionary psychology will at best be able to produce a general understanding of the psychological potentials that inhere in the human gene pool. It will not, however, lead to any understanding of the unique profiles of psychological potentials that are produced by a re-combination of autosomal DNA at the origin of each specific individual person, and that develop over time in interaction with the environment. The latter requires that the gene-centered view is complemented with a person-oriented approach.
Highlights
According to Zagaria et al (2020), evolutionary psychology may be the meta-theory that is needed if psychological science is to enter a paradigmatic stage
Without a complement in the form of a person-oriented perspective, a gene-centered evolutionary psychology will at best be able to produce a general understanding of the psychological potentials that inhere in the human gene pool
The question about the possible compatibility between such a person-oriented approach to psychological science and an evolutionary psychology in the broad sense may be divided into the following subquestions: Is a gene-centered evolutionary psychology compatible with a person-oriented approach which focuses on the person as a complex system that needs to be studied (1) as a whole, (2) as an intentional agent in interaction with its environment, and (3) in terms of his or her individual characteristics and development
Summary
According to Zagaria et al (2020), evolutionary psychology may be the meta-theory that is needed if psychological science is to enter a paradigmatic stage. Other writers have suggested that what psychological science needs is a personoriented approach, where the person is treated as an integrated whole that develops and functions as an intentional agent in interaction with the environment (e.g., Bergman and Andersson 2010; Bergman and Lundh 2015; Bergman and Magnusson 1997; Magnusson 1999, 2001). It has been argued (Lundh 2019) that present-day psychological sciences suffers from a crisis that requires a shift to such a person-oriented paradigm. At a more general level, the person-oriented approach as developed by Bergman and Magnusson (Bergman and Andersson 2010; Bergman and Magnusson 1997; Magnusson 1999, 2001) is firmly anchored in an explicitly holistic and interactionistic paradigm
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
