Abstract
Hugh construes human nature as a union of soul and body. The human being Diana Gregory is thus a composite of a human soul and a human body. Ontologically speaking, what is a human person? Is the person who is Diana Gregory the same as her soul, her body, or the union of her soul and body? The answer Hugh gives to this question appears to commit him to a consequence that contradicts Christian orthodoxy.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
