Abstract

This grounded theory project asked: “How do Library and Information Science (LIS) graduates in non-library roles experience professional identity?” This is an important question for current LIS practitioners and students because job opportunities are increasingly available in non-library work settings. There is limited research available on the professional identity experiences of LIS graduates in general and even less available on the professional experiences of LIS graduates in non-library roles. The study produced the theory of Personalizing Professionalism which found that individuals possess two identities which interact with each other throughout one’s career. The first is an internal appraisal of self which represents an individual’s assessment of who they “really” are as a professional. The second is an externally expressed identity, which represents who that individual presents him or herself to be. Interactions with others impact individuals’ internal appraisal of self and externally expressed identity and represent an area of potential conflict. This study contributes to the research literature on professional identity and identity formation and expression. For the LIS community, understanding how these professionals experience professional identity can help practitioners, educators, and professional associations to take advantage of a wide range of employment options.

Highlights

  • This introductory chapter provides an overview of the research problem explored in this project and the context that inspired that question

  • There are multiple strategies that can be undertaken to respond to a perceived conflict between these two identities which can be grouped into three categories: (1) Assimilation, in which participants change themselves in order to fit into the communities with whom they wish to engage, (2) influencing or attempting to change the perceptions or beliefs of the group, and (3) withdrawal, in which individuals elect only to associate iii with communities of likeminded individuals and to avoid those who do not share their perceptions of the profession

  • Participants exhibited multiple strategies to respond to a perceived conflict between these two identities which can be grouped into three categories: (1) Assimilation, in which participants change themselves in order to fit into the communities with whom they wish to engage, (2) influencing or attempting to change the perceptions or beliefs of the group, and (3) withdrawal, in which individuals elect only to associate with communities of likeminded individuals and to avoid those who do not share their perceptions of the profession

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Two interviews do not provide a sufficient sample to create coding categories, but they do allow for the beginning of the constant comparison process. The first participant’s group is involved in developing information management tools for government employees while the second participant’s group creates tools for libraries (i.e. integrated library systems and related software) This difference in clients meant that some differences in skills were required in their workplaces. In the second participant’s workplace a knowledge of librarianship (and experience working in a library setting) was seen as just as important as transferrable and technical skills in terms of being able to perform the work effectively. The second participant described the value of library instructors sharing their practical experiences in libraries and dealing with different situations that may arise in library work settings – situations that members of the general public who are not familiar with library work would never even consider This suggests that there may be different perceptions of what constitutes the core of LIS education. The pilot interviews provided several areas for comparison and discussion, but as mentioned in the introduction of this memo it is too early to determine which of these will turn into coding categories in the full study

Context
Research Problem
Research Design
Substantive Theory
Significance of the Study
Grounded Theory
Identity
Interpretivism
LIS Graduate
Non-Library Role
Non-Traditional Role
Professional Identity
Profession
Socialization
Thesis Outline
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Study Participants
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
1.10 Conclusion
Research Paradigm
Selection of Grounded Theory
Variations of Grounded Theory
Selection of Glaserian Grounded Theory
Grounded Theory Description
Induction
Theoretical Sampling
Constant Comparison
Memo Writing
Theoretical Saturation
Theory Development
Data Collection
Qualitative Approach
Selection of Semi-Structured Interviews
Development of the Interview Guide
Interview Guide Questions
Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question 5
Question 6
Question 7
Question 8
2.8.10 Question 9
Interview Administration
2.10 Participant Identification
2.11 Target Population
2.12 Participant Demographic Variables
2.12.1 Gender
2.12.3 Time of LIS Studies
2.12.4 Type of Non-Library Role
2.12.5 Experience Working in Library Roles
2.13 Impact of Participant Demographic Variables
2.14 Participant Recruitment
2.15 Sample Size
2.16 Data Analysis
2.16.1 Step 1
2.16.2 Step 2
2.16.3 Step 3
2.16.4 Step 4
2.16.5 Step 5
2.16.6 Step 6
2.16.7 Step 7
2.16.8 Step 8
2.16.9 Step 9
2.16.10 Data Analysis Summary
2.17 Research Quality
2.18 Conclusion
Theoretical Sensitivity
Literature Reviews in Grounded Theory Research
Literature Reviews in this Project
Identity Literature
Significance of Professional Identities
Identity Theories
Flexibility of Identity
LIS Identity Formation
3.10 Multiple Identities and Identity Salience
3.10.1 Multiple Identities and LIS Graduates
3.11 Individuals and Society
3.11.1 The LIS Profession and Society
3.11.2 LIS Stereotypes
3.12 Identity Literature Conclusion
3.13 Literature on Professions and Professionalism
3.14 Professions and Status
3.15 Defining Professions
3.16 LIS Professional Identity
3.17 Defining the Boundaries of the LIS Profession
3.18 Professions and Professionalism Literature Conclusion
3.19 Conclusion
Participants
Participant Work Experiences
Participants’ Jobs and Work Tasks
Pre-MLIS Work Experiences
Library Internship Experiences
Library Work Experiences
Non-Library Work Experiences
Career Paths
Future Ambitions
Career Success and Success Criteria
Conclusion
The Theory of Personalizing Professionalism
The Internal Appraisal of Self
Category 1
Deciding to Attend Library School
Experiencing Library School
Learning and Skills Development
Mentoring
Section Summary
Significance of Socialization on One’s Internal Appraisal of Self
Category 2
Perceptions of Librarians
Librarianship and Technology
The Heterogeneous Library Community
Constraints on Librarians
Understanding Non-LIS Graduates’ Perceptions of Librarians
Significance of Perceiving the Profession on One’s Internal Appraisal of Self
Category 3
Category 4
Librarianship and Other Professions
Interactions with the “Non-Traditional” LIS Community
Interactions with the “Traditional” LIS Community
Conflicts with Others
Assimilation
Trying to Influence the Community
Withdrawal or Seeking Out Other Communities
The Externally Expressed Identity
5.10 Category 5
5.10.1 Identifying as a Librarian
5.10.2 Sometimes Identifying as a Librarian
5.10.3 Choosing Not to Identify as a Librarian
5.10.4 Identifying as a Non-Practicing or Non-Active Librarian
5.10.5 Section Summary
5.11 Category 6
5.11.1 Identifying and Valuing Skills
5.11.2 Developing Success Strategies
5.12 Conclusion
Multiple Identities
Identity Salience
Commitment
Identity Manifestation
Relationship to Identity Literature
Motivations for Entering LIS Programs
Career Planning and Non-Library Roles
Mentors and Role Models
Multiple Identities and LIS Graduates
The LIS Profession and Society
Professions and Professionalism
The Second Literature Review
Recent LIS Literature on Professional Identity
Boundaries of the LIS Profession
Socialization into the LIS Profession
LIS Professional Identity
Constructivism and Sense-Making
Career Literature
Defining Careers
Career Success
Personal Lives and Careers
Gender and Careers
Career Success Predictors
Research Question and Methodology
Theory Evaluation Criteria
Insights and Further Questions
Impact of a Personalized Professional Identity on Group Interactions
Implications
Implications for Practitioners
Implications for Researchers
Recommendations Arising from this Theory
Professional Identity is Malleable
Recommendations – Professional Identity is Malleable
Perceptions of the Profession are Personalized
Recommendations – Perceptions of the Profession are Personalized
Career Objectives are Personalized and Change Over the Course of One’s Career
7.7.11 Continuous Learning Is Seen as a Key Career Success Strategy
Limitations
Future Research Directions
7.10 Researcher Reflections
7.11 Conclusion
Have you ever worked in a library?
How did your LIS education prepare you for your current job?
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call