Abstract

Accurate models of clinical actions and their impacts on disease progression are critical for estimating personalized optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) in medical/health research, especially in managing chronic conditions. Traditional statistical methods for DTRs usually focus on estimating the optimal treatment or dosage at each given medical intervention, but overlook the important question of “when this intervention should happen.” We fill this gap by developing a two-step Bayesian approach to optimize clinical decisions with timing. In the first step, we build a generative model for a sequence of medical interventions—which are discrete events in continuous time—with a marked temporal point process (MTPP) where the mark is the assigned treatment or dosage. Then this clinical action model is embedded into a Bayesian joint framework where the other components model clinical observations including longitudinal medical measurements and time-to-event data conditional on treatment histories. In the second step, we propose a policy gradient method to learn the personalized optimal clinical decision that maximizes the patient survival by interacting the MTPP with the model on clinical observations while accounting for uncertainties in clinical observations learned from the posterior inference of the Bayesian joint model in the first step. A signature application of the proposed approach is to schedule follow-up visitations and assign a dosage at each visitation for patients after kidney transplantation. We evaluate our approach with comparison to alternative methods on both simulated and real-world datasets. In our experiments, the personalized decisions made by the proposed method are clinically useful: they are interpretable and successfully help improve patient survival.

Highlights

  • In biomedical applications involving long-term personalized care of patients with chronic health conditions, treatments often include a sequence of decision making and must be adaptive to the uniquely evolving disease progression of each patient

  • We develop a Bayesian joint model consisting of a generative probabilistic submodel for clinical decisions with timing and a submodel for clinical observations: these two submodels share certain structures and parameters in order to capture the mutual influence between the clinical observations and decisions

  • The method is cuttingedge because (1) we build a generative probabilistic model that properly handles clinical decisions with timing; (2) we embed this decision process into a Bayesian joint model that models clinical observations; (3) we propose a Bayesian optimization procedure to optimize personalized treatment schedules alongside other clinical decisions while accounting for uncertainties in clinical observations based on the posterior inference of the proposed Bayesian joint model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In biomedical applications involving long-term personalized care of patients with chronic health conditions (e.g., diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus infections, and chronic kidney diseases), treatments often include a sequence of decision making and must be adaptive to the uniquely evolving disease progression of each patient. We propose an optimization method that allows the decision model, by interacting with the other parts of the joint model, to learn to make the personalized optimal clinical decision at the right time while accounting for uncertainties in clinical observations. Such a joint model and the proposed optimization method will be useful in many biomedical applications.

A signature application
Why not use existing methods?
Why use our method?
Problem formulation
First step: a Bayesian joint model
Modeling clinical decisions
Linking clinical observations with clinical decisions
Second step: optimize personalized clinical decision
Simulation study
Simulation setup
Results: model fitting
Results: personalized optimal clinical decision estimation
Application
Experimental results: model fitting
Experimental results: personalized optimal clinical decision estimation
Ablation study: optimizing time or dosage or both
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call