Abstract

Accumulating evidence from human-based research has highlighted that the prevalent one-size-fits-all approach for neural and behavioral interventions is inefficient. This approach can benefit one individual, but be ineffective or even detrimental for another. Studying the efficacy of the large range of different parameters for different individuals is costly, time-consuming and requires a large sample size that makes such research impractical and hinders effective interventions. Here an active machine learning technique is presented across participants—personalized Bayesian optimization (pBO)—that searches available parameter combinations to optimize an intervention as a function of an individual’s ability. This novel technique was utilized to identify transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency and current strength combinations most likely to improve arithmetic performance, based on a subject’s baseline arithmetic abilities. The pBO was performed across all subjects tested, building a model of subject performance, capable of recommending parameters for future subjects based on their baseline arithmetic ability. pBO successfully searches, learns, and recommends parameters for an effective neurointervention as supported by behavioral, simulation, and neural data. The application of pBO in human-based research opens up new avenues for personalized and more effective interventions, as well as discoveries of protocols for treatment and translation to other clinical and non-clinical domains.

Highlights

  • There is no doubt that the human organism is complex, and the impact of nature and nurture, as well as their interaction, increases variability between humans

  • One stimulation technique that is gaining popularity is transcranial alternating current stimulation [12]. tACS utilizes an alternating current delivered via multiple electrodes placed on the scalp, which is capable of propagating through the scalp and modulating the activity of the underlying neurons

  • Baseline ability is a continuous parameter and it should be considered that the best inferred tACS combination differs along this continuum

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is no doubt that the human organism is complex, and the impact of nature and nurture, as well as their interaction, increases variability between humans. The one-size-fits-all approach often only alleviates symptoms in clinical studies without curing the disease [11] This demand for personalization is especially true in the field of transcranial stimulation, where electrical currents targeting specific brain regions are used to alter behavior. The applied alternating current promotes oscillatory activity at the stimulation frequency [13], allowing direct modulation of brain oscillations that subserve cognitive processes [14]. Through this process, tACS provides an attractive way to investigate causal predictors of behavior and to use such knowledge to improve human capabilities or health. Exploring the effects of all tACS parameters on the performance of different individuals requires an exhausting amount of testing when considering different current (0–2 mA) and frequency (0–100 Hz) combinations

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call