Personalised activity cards, goal‐directed daily (physical) activity and rest‐activity rhythm in institutionalised persons living with dementia

Abstract

AbstractBackground(Physical) inactivity and disturbances in the rest‐activity rhythm (e.g. more daytime sleeping and more night‐time restlessness) are common in institutionalised persons living with dementia (iPwD). Both are associated with worse quality of life (QoL), which underlines the need for non‐pharmacological interventions. The purpose of this study was to examine if the implementation of personalised activity cards (PACs) could enhance the amount of time spent on goal‐directed daily (physical) activities and improve the rest‐activity rhythm in iPwD.MethodThis prospective longitudinal quasi‐experimental multicentre study was conducted on 11 wards in 8 nursing homes in the Netherlands. The intervention consisted of PACs, a structured method for offering personalised activities based on input from (professional) caregivers. The PACs were implemented on 5 wards. The other 6 wards received care as usual (control group). Intervention compliance was checked every two weeks with an online survey. Outcome variables included minutes spent on goal‐directed daily (physical) activity as measured with an adjusted version of the Physical Activity Survey in Long‐Term Care (PAS‐LTC; observations by researchers), and rest‐activity rhythm was assessed using Actiwatch activity monitors. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T0), and after 12‐15 weeks (T1).ResultWe analysed the data of 84 iPwD; intervention group: n = 35, control group: n = 49 (Table 1). Intention‐to‐treat mixed model analyses showed no significant interaction effects of the intervention (group × time) on goal‐directed daily (physical) activity and rest‐activity rhythm variables (Table 2). One ward in the intervention group did not implement the PACs. The four wards that did implement the PACs reported diverging percentages of the execution of planned activities, even as low as 33.5% (range 33.5‐74.2%). The most reported reason for not executing activities on the PACs was that employees were too busy.ConclusionContrary to our expectations, implementing PACs did not show any effect on goal‐directed daily (physical) activity in iPwD. The lack of improvement in activity level might be an explanation for the lack of improvement in rest‐activity rhythm. These findings support previous research that it can be difficult to implement new methods in the nursing home environment, and underline the importance of more implementation research