Abstract

Background: Air pollution is a known risk factor for adverse health effects. Many epidemiological studies use outdoor air pollution levels based on fixed-site monitoring data as a surrogate for human exposure, however individuals spend, on average, 85% of their time indoors, where exposure sources differ from outdoors. Personal monitoring allows more appropriate exposure estimation, but, to date, little has been done to compare exposure based on fixed-site versus personal monitoring, and no such comparisons have been carried out in the Middle East. Aims: To investigate the validity of fixed-site versus personal monitoring of PM2.5 in an industrial city in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We collected 24-hour personal monitoring of PM2.5 exposure from 28 students aged 16-18 years, using a SidePak AM510 set to record PM2.5 levels every minute. Students completed a time-activity diary to identify time spent in key microenvironments, especially outdoors and indoors. Students also carried a GPS device to log their geogr...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.