Abstract

Background Emerging evidence demonstrates that postgraduate researchers have high rates of mental health problems. These problems are distressing, affect PhD studies, and have longer-term potential effects beyond the duration of the PhD. Yet large-scale studies of multiple risk and protective factors are rare. Aims We aimed to test the predictive validity of a comprehensive set of potential determinants of mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety and suicidality) among postgraduate researchers in the UK, including personal, study-related, and supervision characteristics. Method We used regression models applied to data obtained from a national online survey of UK postgraduate researchers (Understanding DOCtoral researcher mental health; U-DOC, 2018–2019) to test predictors of mental health symptoms. Results These models show that postgraduate researchers' mental health symptoms are predicted by demographic, occupational, psychological, social and supervisory relationship factors. Greater perfectionism, more impostor thoughts and reduced supervisory communion most strongly and consistently predict mental health symptoms. Conclusions Institutions training postgraduate researchers should focus interventions intended to improve depression, anxiety, suicidality, on self-beliefs and social connectedness. Moreover, supervisors should be provided with training that improves the degree of agency, and especially communion, in the relationships they form with postgraduate researchers.

Highlights

  • Emerging evidence demonstrates that postgraduate researchers have high rates of mental health problems

  • Supervisors should be provided with training that improves the degree of agency, and especially communion, in the relationships they form with postgraduate researchers

  • Recent largescale studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of depression, anxiety and suicidality among Postgraduate researchers (PGRs) in several countries.[2,3,4,5]

Read more

Summary

Methods

We used regression models applied to data obtained from a national online survey of UK postgraduate researchers (Understanding DOCtoral researcher mental health; U-DOC, 2018–2019) to test predictors of mental health symptoms. This study uses data from 3352 current UK PGRs who participated in a cross-sectional self-report online survey (the Understanding DOCtoral researcher mental health (U-DOC) survey, 2018–2019). Participants completed a battery of survey and free-text questions about mental health, well-being and experiences of PhD study. We assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human participants were approved by the University of Sussex Sciences and Technology Cross-Schools Research Ethics Committee (approval reference: ER/ CH283/9). We report additional details regarding participants and procedures elsewhere.[3,27]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call