Abstract

The Polish taxation system has been undergoing substantial changes in recent years, aimed at creating a more transparent system and conforming to the taxation standards of market economy countries. The two most important changes were introduction of the personal income tax (PIT) in 1992 and replacement of the turnover tax with the value added tax (VAT) in 1993. The uniform personal income tax covered all incomes generated by natural persons irrespective of where the sources of income are located. The reform provided also a more equitable distribution of the tax burden by introducing a progressive system with three nominal tax rates (in 1992-20%, 30%, 40%).A comparative study of the effective PIT rate for pensioners and other groups of PIT payers is the main goal of this paper. The study refers to our own research on data received from The information of Polish Ministry of Finance about accounting of PIT in several subsequent years. Statistics cover a period from 1993 to 2003. However, numbers of taxpayers refer also to year 1992 when the PIT has been established and a period from 2004 to 2006.Concluding the situation in Poland, taxpayers with the highest income make exhaustive use of tax reductions. There are occurring situations when well-off people benefit more than people with relatively minor income (e. g. pensioners). It happens even if most of deductions were aimed generally at all taxpayers. Such a situation reduces the impression of the system fairness. Because tax deductions reduce budgetary revenues, the foregone revenues have to be compensated by other taxes or / and higher rates. Therefore, the system of deductions and relief, on the one hand, supports the special gains (e. g. house building), however, on the other it generates costs. It is possible that the reduction of tax rate for the I tax bracket and removal of some tax exemptions and deductions would make the Polish personal income tax more transparent, equal and simple.

Highlights

  • The study of tax-related issues viewed from the perspective of personal income requires a short introduction to the Polish tax law regulations.The Polish taxation system has been undergoing substantial changes in recent years aimed at creating a more transparent system and conforming to taxation standards existing in market economy countries

  • Income from special branches of agriculture is subject to income tax; forestry; property falling under provisions on inheritance and donations; resulting from activities which cannot be considered a subject of a legally effective contract; distribution of the joint property of spouses due to the cessation or limitation of their property co-ownership; ship-owners falling under provisions on tonnage tax; payment for supporting family needs according to Article 27 of Family and Guardianship Code

  • Some examples tax remitters in Poland can be: employers - in case of income receive from employment, social insurance institutions (ZUS and KRUS) - in case of old-age, disability or survivor pensions or some other kinds of benefit from the social insurance, banks - in case of interest or other revenues earned from cash means deposited on the taxpayer's bank accounts

Read more

Summary

PERSONAL INCOME TAXATION IN POLAND

A comparative study ofthe effective PIT rate for pensioners and other groups ofPITpayers is the main goal ofthis paper. Numbers of taxpayers refer to year 7992 when the PIT has been established and a period from 2004 to 2006. Concluding the situation in Poland, taxpayers with the highest income make exhaustive use of tax reductions. It happens even if most ofdeductions were aimed generally at all taxpayers. Such a situation reduces the impression of the system fairness. It is possible that the reduction of tax rate for the I tax bracket and removal ofsome tax exemptions and deductions would make the Polish personal income tax more transparent, equal and simple

Introduction
Groups of PIT taxpayers according to tax settlement form
Effective personal income tax burden for different sources of revenue
Tax bracket
Tax bracket I
Total Revenues from pennanent employment Pensions Revenues from running private
Conclusions
Findings
GYVENTOJŲ PAJAMŲ APMOKESTINIMAS LENKIJOJE
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call