Abstract
BackgroundThere is limited comparative data on patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) switched from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab and those continuing intravenously. This study aimed to compare the persistence and tolerance of subcutaneous and intravenous infliximab and the outcomes of patients resuming intravenous infliximab. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study involving IBD patients treated with maintenance intravenous infliximab. The switch to subcutaneous infliximab was offered to patients in clinical remission receiving an intravenous dose ≤ 10 mg kg-1 every ≥ 6 weeks. The switch group was compared to controls remaining on intravenous infliximab due to refusal of the switch. ResultsWith a median follow-up of 59 (46–67) weeks, subcutaneous infliximab was discontinued in 28/282 (10 %) patients and intravenous infliximab in 1/78 (1 %) patient (p = 0.01); after propensity score-matching of the two cohorts, persistence rates at 52 weeks were respectively 91 % (95 % CI 84–98) and 100 % (95 % CI 100–100, p = 0.01). Among the 28 who discontinued subcutaneous infliximab, 27 resumed intravenous infliximab, with 4 (1 % of the switch group) who permanently stopped infliximab. ConclusionSwitching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab led to a lower treatment persistance. In cases of poor tolerance or relapse under subcutaneous infliximab, resuming intravenous infliximab is effective.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
