Abstract

This paper examines persistence in the cryptocurrency market. Two different long-memory methods (R/S analysis and fractional integration) are used to analyse it in the case of the four main cryptocurrencies (BitCoin, LiteCoin, Ripple, Dash) over the sample period 2013-2017. The findings indicate that this market exhibits persistence (there is a positive correlation between its past and future values), and that its degree changes over time. Such predictability represents evidence of market inefficiency: trend trading strategies can be used to generate abnormal profits in the cryptocurrency market.

Highlights

  • The exponential growth of BitCoin and other cryptocurrencies is a phenomenon that has attracted considerable attention in recent years

  • One of the key issues yet to be analysed is whether the dynamic behaviour of cryptocurrencies is predictable, which would be inconsistent with the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), according to which prices should follow a random walk

  • We focus on the four cryptocurrencies with the highest market capitalisation and longest span of data: BitCoin, LiteCoin, Ripple and Dash

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The exponential growth of BitCoin and other cryptocurrencies is a phenomenon that has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Several studies have provided evidence of persistence in asset price dynamics (see Greene and Fielitz, 1977; Caporale et al, 2016), and found that this changes over time (see Lo, 1991), but virtually none has focused on the cryptocurrency market. The present study carries out a more comprehensive analysis by considering four main cryptocurrencies (the most liquid ones: BitCoin, LiteCoin, Ripple, Dash) and applying two different long-memory methods (R/S analysis and fractional integration) over the period 2013–2017 to investigate their stochastic properties. It examines the evolution of persistence over time (by looking at changes in the Hurst exponent). 28 Apr 2013 07 Aug 2015 04 Aug 2013 23 Jul 2017 28 Apr 2013 14 Feb 2014 01 Apr 2015 20 Jan 2017 09 Sept 2016 21 May 2014

Literature review
Data and methodology
The standard deviation SIa is calculated for each sub-period Ia
Empirical results
Conclusions
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.