Abstract

AbstractPersistence, defined as a trait‐like characteristic, reflects the personal tendency to endure different hardships. In a recently developed model, three dimensions—persistence despite difficulties, persistence despite fear, and inappropriate persistence—were proposed to cover distinct facets of this ability, along with goal‐time preferences as a persistence‐related construct. The Multidimensional Persistence Scale (MPS) and the Goal‐Time Preferences Scale (GTPS) were created to gauge these two separate constructs. In the current study, we conducted two studies using the Polish version of the scales (MPS‐PL and GTPS‐PL, respectively), with the aim of evaluating both measures. We also proposed a profile model as better reflecting the multidimensionality of persistence as opposed to the original superordinate model. In Study 1, the three‐factor structure of the MPS‐PL was supported by a confirmatory factor analysis. In contrast, the GTPS‐PL showed a poor fit to the data as well as a vague factor structure. In Study 2, we tested the nomological network of the MPS‐PL, providing evidence for its construct validity as well as the distinctiveness of its dimensions. Finally, we conducted a latent profile analysis, which revealed the three qualitatively different configurations of persistence dimensions in the total study sample. Overall, the evidence we gathered supports our proposal about persistence as a multidimensional profile construct.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call