Abstract

BackgroundMediation analysis can be used to evaluate the effect of an exposure on an outcome acting through an intermediate variable or mediator. For studies with small sample sizes, permutation testing may be useful in evaluating the indirect effect (i.e., the effect of exposure on the outcome through the mediator) while maintaining the appropriate type I error rate. For mediation analysis in studies with small sample sizes, existing permutation testing methods permute the residuals under the full or alternative model, but have not been evaluated under situations where covariates are included. In this article, we consider and evaluate two additional permutation approaches for testing the indirect effect in mediation analysis based on permutating the residuals under the reduced or null model which allows for the inclusion of covariates.MethodsSimulation studies were used to empirically evaluate the behavior of these two additional approaches: (1) the permutation test of the Indirect Effect under Reduced Models (IERM) and (2) the Permutation Supremum test under Reduced Models (PSRM). The performance of these methods was compared to the standard permutation approach for mediation analysis, the permutation test of the Indirect Effect under Full Models (IEFM). We evaluated the type 1 error rates and power of these methods in the presence of covariates since mediation analysis assumes no unmeasured confounders of the exposure–mediator–outcome relationships.ResultsThe proposed PSRM approach maintained type I error rates below nominal levels under all conditions, while the proposed IERM approach exhibited grossly inflated type I rates in many conditions and the standard IEFM exhibited inflated type I error rates under a small number of conditions. Power did not differ substantially between the proposed PSRM approach and the standard IEFM approach.ConclusionsThe proposed PSRM approach is recommended over the existing IEFM approach for mediation analysis in studies with small sample sizes.

Highlights

  • Mediation analysis can be used to evaluate whether the exposure acts on the outcome through an intermediate variable

  • In order to accommodate covariates, we propose two additional permutation approaches for testing the indirect effect in mediation analysis based on permutation of residuals under the reduced model: (1) the permutation test of the Indirect Effect under Reduced Models (IERM), (2) the Permutation Supremum test

  • We propose two permutation approaches to test the indirect effect, which permutes the residuals under the reduced model (Freedman & Lane, 1983) and have not been previously implemented for mediation analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mediation analysis can be used to evaluate whether the exposure acts on the outcome through an intermediate variable (i.e., the mediator). For studies with small sample sizes, bootstrapping approaches can result in inflated type I error rates and permutation testing has been proposed as an alternative resampling approach (Koopman et al, 2015; Tofighi & MacKinnon, 2011; Williams & MacKinnon, 2008). For studies with small sample sizes, permutation testing may be useful in evaluating the indirect effect (i.e., the effect of exposure on the outcome through the mediator) while maintaining the appropriate type I error rate. Methods: Simulation studies were used to empirically evaluate the behavior of these two additional approaches: (1) the permutation test of the Indirect Effect under Reduced Models (IERM) and (2) the Permutation Supremum test under Reduced Models (PSRM). Conclusions: The proposed PSRM approach is recommended over the existing IEFM approach for mediation analysis in studies with small sample sizes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.