Abstract

Suppose X 1 , X 2 , … , X n is a random sample from N p ( θ , V ) . Because the likelihood ratio test (LRT) of H 0 : θ 1 = θ 2 = ⋯ = θ p versus H 1 – H 0 with H 1 : θ i ⩾ 0 for i = 1 , 2 , … , p is complicated, several ad hoc tests have been proposed. Tang et al. [(1989). An approximate likelihood ratio test for a normal mean vector with nonnegative components with application to clinical trials. Biometrika 76, 577–583] proposed an approximate LRT; Follmann [(1996). A simple multivariate test for one-sided alternatives. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91, 854–861] suggested rejecting H 0 if the usual test of H 0 versus ∼ H 0 rejects H 0 with significance level 2 α and X ¯ 1 + ⋯ + X ¯ p > 0 ; and Chongcharoen et al. [(2002). Powers of some one-sided multivariate tests with the population covariance matrix known up to a multiplicative constant. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 107, 103–121] modified Follmann's test to include information about the correlation structure in the sum of the sample means. It is desirable for such tests to be permutation and scale invariant. The LRT is permutation and scale invariant and it is not difficult to modify the Follmann-type tests to have these properties. We study modifications of the tests by Tang, Gnecco and Geller that are permutation and scale invariant.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.