Abstract
Many regular and irregular indirect network topologies have been proposed that allow one to pass some fraction of permutations even in the presence of various faults, which depend largely on the reliability of the network. This paper studies the performance of a well-known augmented shuffle exchange network (ASEN) regular network, irregular network FT and the proposed new irregular network, the Smart Four Tree (SFT). It has been found that the reliability of the SFT network is best among these three networks, at the expense of increased cost, and that it also provides better permutation capabilities with reduced latency in the event of faults. Comparison of these networks, based on these metrics, exhibit the preferred performance of the irregular SFT over the regular ASEN and the irregular FT.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
