Abstract
Abstract The article presents and assesses the shortcomings of the applicable provisions regarding the maintenance of the necessary distance behind the preceding vehicle in road traffic. We are exposed to accidents when using vehicles. The human factor contributes greatly to their occurrence. A problem analysis was carried out with proposed changes. The conclusions indicate the need for conducting training and clarification of the provisions in the applicable road traffic law. The introduction of new technical devices for determining the distance, in extreme situations, does not eliminate the danger of colliding with the preceding vehicle. In this respect, the regulations are imprecise, and the lack of knowledge of drivers is huge. The proposed actions relate to the area of active safety system of vehicles in road traffic.
Highlights
Road transport is an area where car use plays an important role
The proposed actions relate to the area of active safety system of vehicles in road traffic
The security system was based on the regulations contained in the Road Traffic Act
Summary
Road transport is an area where car use plays an important role. Citizens of European Union (EU) Member States have unrestricted opportunities to cross the Union’s borders. Drivers do not understand that by entering between two vehicles distant from each other by Smin, they create a very dangerous situation of increased risk of accident They do not know how the law regulates the issue of maintaining a minimum distance that does not cause offenses due to “cutting off other vehicles”. The analysis and assessment concerns provisions obliging the driver to maintain a sufficient distance (distance) behind the preceding vehicle in road traffic Among other things, it analyzed what results from applicable regulations. The subjects of the study are vehicle drivers, participating in traffic on public roads in EU countries and the applicable rules – regulations (which are part of the safety system) that regulate road traffic in EU member states They were based on the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic. The following questions can be formulated: can legal provisions contain unclear, vague, imprecise wording? If such formulations were included, should we accept or tolerate them? Are we obliged to eliminate them from existing legislation? Should imprecise or undefined legal provision be clarified or removed? Which level of irregularity is acceptable and which is not?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
