Permeability prediction and diagenesis in tight carbonates using machine learning techniques

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning techniques have found their way into many problems in geoscience but have not been used significantly in the analysis of tight rocks. We present a case study testing the effectiveness of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms for the prediction of permeability in tight carbonate rocks. The dataset consists of 130 core plugs from the Portland Formation in southern England, all of which have measurements of Klinkenberg-corrected permeability, helium porosity, characteristic pore throat diameter, and formation resistivity. Permeability has been predicted using genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks, as well as seven conventional ‘benchmark’ models with which the machine learning techniques have been compared. The genetic algorithm technique has provided a new empirical equation that fits the measured permeability better than any of the seven conventional benchmark models. However, the artificial neural network technique provided the best overall prediction method, quantified by the lowest root-mean-square error (RMSE) and highest coefficient of determination value (R2). The lowest RMSE from the conventional permeability equations was from the RGPZ equation, which predicted the test dataset with an RMSE of 0.458, while the highest RMSE came from the Berg equation, with an RMSE of 2.368. By comparison, the RMSE for the genetic algorithm and artificial neural network methods were 0.433 and 0.38, respectively. We attribute the better performance of machine learning techniques over conventional approaches to their enhanced capability to model the connectivity of pore microstructures caused by codependent and competing diagenetic processes. We also provide a qualitative model for the poroperm characteristics of tight carbonate rocks modified by each of eight diagenetic processes. We conclude that, for tight carbonate reservoirs, both machine learning techniques predict permeability more reliably and more accurately than conventional models and may be capable of distinguishing quantitatively between pore microstructures caused by different diagenetic processes.