Abstract

ObjectivesA significant number of chronic pain patients rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of their intractable pain. A screening trial using percutaneous electrodes is an integral step for predicting a successful treatment course with a permanent SCS system. Most of these trials are performed in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center and some in the office setting. However, there are select patients who are considered poor candidates for percutaneous trials. We present the initial report of patients who have received surgical implantation of permanent paddle-leads for SCS trials at our institution and show that this was a safe and effective alternative for our patients who could not undergo percutaneous trials. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts of 12 patients who underwent permanent surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials from 2014 to 2017. Success was considered positive with a 50% reduction in pain rating. If positive, patients were brought back to the operating room to have the implanted leads connected to an internalized pulse generator. ResultsAll 12 patients met the criteria for a successful trial. Only one patient had his SCS system surgically removed after nine months. None of our patients reported or returned with paddle-lead migrations or infections. ConclusionsWe report that surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials were a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous trials in our patients who were deemed poor candidates for percutaneous trials. No complications occurred and all of our patients received a second surgery for internalization of the SCS system. Patients who have previously failed percutaneous trials may be false-negatives to SCS.

Highlights

  • A significant number of patients with chronic pain, including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of their intractable pain

  • We report that surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials were a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous trials in our patients who were deemed poor candidates for percutaneous trials

  • No complications occurred and all of our patients received a second surgery for internalization of the SCS system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A significant number of patients with chronic pain, including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of their intractable pain. A screening trial of SCS using percutaneous electrodes is an integral step for predicting a successful treatment course with a permanent spinal cord stimulator. There are select patients who are considered poor candidates for these percutaneous trials. Percutaneous trials for patients with instrumentation from prior thoracic fusions are often unsuccessful due to the hindrance of the instrumentation to the passage of the leads. Patients with high-grade scoliosis can make percutaneous trials unsuccessful due to the negative effect of the severe curvature of the spine on the course of the leads

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.