Abstract

Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical benefit and predictors of ventricular pacing in TAVI patients receiving PPM for this indication remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated pacemaker interrogation data of patients who received a PPM post TAVI for new LBBB and new AVB I. The primary endpoint of this study was relevant ventricular pacing (ventricular pacing rate: Vp ≥ 1%) at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation. Secondary endpoints were predictors for relevant ventricular pacing. At the first pacemaker interrogation (median follow up at 6.23 [2.8–14.8] months), median ventricular pacing frequency was 1.0% [0.1–17.8]. Out of 61 patients, 36 (59%) had Vp rates ≥ 1%. Patients with frequent ventricular pacing showed longer QRS duration (155 ms ± 17 ms vs. 144 ms ± 18 ms, p = 0.018) at the time of PPM implantation and were less likely treated with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens Valve (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.040). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Further prospective studies are necessary to identify patients at higher risk of pacemaker dependency.

Highlights

  • Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

  • Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for preventive reasons in patients with new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) ­I8–10

  • Patients were included for analysis, if PPM implantation was performed for new LBBB and new AVB I

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Conduction disorders remain a frequent complication and often necessitate permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation This poses an additional risk for complications and is associated with longer hospital stay and higher c­ osts[4]. High ventricular pacing rates (Vp) can cause deterioration of left ventricular function and may limit the beneficial effects of T­ AVI6,7 This may limit the success of TAVI especially in younger, low risk patients. The aim of this study was to determine atrial (Ap) and ventricular pacing rates (Vp) in a larger cohort of patients with new LBBB and new relevant AVB I after TAVI at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation and to identify predisposing factors for frequent ventricular pacing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call