Abstract
We provide a new explanation for the stronger relationship between income and subjective wellbeing (SWB) found in cross-sectional versus panel studies based on the predictions of a rational expectations model of utility maximization with permanent and transitory income shocks. The model predicts that SWB is affected by unanticipated rather than anticipated income shocks, and is more influenced by permanent rather than transitory income shocks. We confirm the model predictions empirically by analyzing panel data from China, and show that differences in the relative importance of permanent income can explain the stronger (weaker) impact of income often found in cross-sectional (panel) estimation. We also empirically confirm asymmetric impacts of positive and negative transitory income shocks as predicted by a model with credit constraints.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
