Abstract

The relationship between employers and workers tends to be characterized by a tension between the employers' and workers' interests. While the employers maintain business continuity to obtain optimal advantages, the workers demand to get decent wages or welfare. For example, the laborers have struggled through a constitutional way by submitting a judicial review of Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. This research used a conceptual approach and a philosophical approach to observe the relevant legal material in the Constitutional Court's decision to obtain legal guarantees with more legal certainty. In conclusion, this research found that: (a) The phrase 'for the sake of the law' should have granted the laborers more legal protection. However, it still creates multiple interpretations that lead to the loss of certain legal protections. (b) The Constitutional Court, through its decision, has laid the basis of legality with more legal certainty through the implementation of labor protection norms gradually. (c) Even though the Constitutional Court's decision has already provided legal certainty normatively, the uncertainty of legal protection still exists in practices.

Highlights

  • The relationship between employers and workers tends to be characterized by a tension between the employers' and workers' interests

  • It still creates multiple interpretations that lead to the loss of certain legal protections. (b) The Constitutional Court, through its decision, has laid the basis of legality with more legal certainty through the implementation of labor protection norms gradually. (c) Even though the Constitutional Court's decision has already provided legal certainty normatively, the uncertainty of legal protection still exists in practices

  • Undang No 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara

Read more

Summary

REFLEKSI HUKUM

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA KONTRAK DAN OUTSOURCING, SERTA PROBLEMATIKA IMPLEMENTASINYA

ARTICLE INFO
Norma Perlindungan Buruh Secara Berjenjang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi
Putusan MK Masih Menyisakan Ketidakpastian Perlindungan Hukum Pada Aras Empirik
DAFTAR REFERENSI
Artikel Jurnal
Putusan Pengadilan
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.