Abstract

One hundred consecutive patients with pelvic fractures who had undergone peritoneal lavage and abdominal and pelvic angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-four patients with negative lavages were treated successfully without laparotomy despite a 20 percent incidence of subcapsular or intraparenchymal hematomas of the liver or spleen. Thirty percent of the patients with positive peritoneal lavages were successfully managed without laparotomy when abdominal angiography failed to identify a source of active bleeding. Abdominal angiography was 92 percent accurate in predicting the presence or absence of hemorrhage in 25 patients who underwent laparotomy. There were no false-positive angiograms. The overall false-negative rate was 2.12 percent. These occurred in two patients with torn mesenteric vessels. Pelvic angiography identified arterial pelvic bleeding in 18 percent of the patients. Eighty-four percent of patients with major pelvic bleeding had successful embolization with prompt cessation of arterial bleeding. We conclude that abdominal and pelvic angiography can be a useful adjunct to peritoneal lavage in detecting intraperitoneal hemorrhage and can be of therapeutic value for arterial pelvic bleeding.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.