Abstract

Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories. Experiment 1 focused on exploration patterns during the first object recognition test postsurgery, in which each trial contained 1 novel and 1 familiar object. The perirhinal cortex lesions reduced time spent exploring novel objects, but did not affect overall time spent exploring the test objects (novel plus familiar). Replications with subsequent cohorts of rats (Experiments 2, 3, 4.1) repeated this pattern of results. When all recognition memory data were combined (Experiments 1–4), giving totals of 44 perirhinal lesion rats and 40 surgical sham controls, the perirhinal cortex lesions caused a marginal reduction in total exploration time. That decrease in time with novel objects was often compensated by increased exploration of familiar objects. Experiment 4 also assessed the impact of proactive interference on recognition memory. Evidence emerged that prior object experience could additionally impair recognition performance in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Experiment 5 examined exploration levels when rats were just given pairs of novel objects to explore. Despite their perirhinal cortex lesions, exploration levels were comparable with those of control rats. While the results of Experiment 4 support the notion that perirhinal lesions can increase sensitivity to proactive interference, the overall findings question whether rats lacking a perirhinal cortex typically behave as if novel objects are familiar, that is, show false recognition. Rather, the rats retain a signal of novelty but struggle to discriminate the identity of that signal.

Highlights

  • Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories

  • The present study examined these accounts by studying the exploration levels of rats with perirhinal lesions when confronted with a series of novel and familiar objects

  • The present study quantified the impact of perirhinal cortex lesions on the exploration of novel and familiar objects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories. While the results of Experiment 4 support the notion that perirhinal lesions can increase sensitivity to proactive interference, the overall findings question whether rats lacking a perirhinal cortex typically behave as if novel objects are familiar, that is, show false recognition. Thereby, perirhinal cortex lesions increase sensitivity to interference from related stimuli (Bartko, Winters, Cowell, Saksida, & Bussey, 2007b; Norman & Eacott, 2004), as the stimuli share more common features This sensitivity causes novel objects to appear familiar, so disrupting recognition memory (Bartko, Winters, Cowell, Saksida, & Bussey, 2007a; Cowell et al, 2010; McTighe, Cowell, Winters, Bussey, & Saksida, 2010).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call