Periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty: What are the advantages of minimal-invasive surgery?

Abstract

ObjectivesPeriprosthetic femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty in older adults are mostly treated by internal fixation. Members of the GETRAUM (French Orthopedic Trauma Society) sought to compare two surgical techniques – conventional open surgery and minimally invasive surgery – with the aim of analyzing the patients’ functional recovery. We hypothesized that a minimally invasive technique would produce better early functional outcomes with recovery of independence. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective multicenter study of patients treated between 2009 and 2015 consisted of 90 fractures with a follow-up of 1 year. Demographic, preoperative data and the characteristics of fractures, type of fixation and the surgeon's experience level were collected. The endpoints were the Parker Mobility score, Katz ADL, place of residence at the time of fracture and at 6 months and one-year follow-up. All complications and one-year mortality during the follow up were searched. ResultsAt 6 months follow-up, the minimally invasive technique contributed to significantly better functional recovery as measured by the Parker (p < 0.05) and Katz scores (p < 0.05). However, there were no differences in these scores at one-year follow-up. The complication rate was 31% at one year follow-up. Mortality rate was 12 % (11 patients). ConclusionOur hypothesis was confirmed, as there was a difference between techniques that impacted functional recovery and independence, but only in the early postoperative phase. A minimally invasive technique appears to be beneficial in the short term for distal femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty but must be evaluated in a comparative and prospective study to fully confirm its reliability.