Abstract

Peripheral visual cues lead to large shifts in psychometric distributions of temporal-order judgments. In one view, such shifts are attributed to attention speeding up processing of the cued stimulus, so-called prior entry. However, sometimes these shifts are so large that it is unlikely that they are caused by attention alone. Here we tested the prevalent alternative explanation that the cue is sometimes confused with the target on a perceptual level, bolstering the shift of the psychometric function. We applied a novel model of cued temporal-order judgments, derived from Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention. We found that cue–target confusions indeed contribute to shifting psychometric functions. However, cue-induced changes in the processing rates of the target stimuli play an important role, too. At smaller cueing intervals, the cue increased the processing speed of the target. At larger intervals, inhibition of return was predominant. Earlier studies of cued TOJs were insensitive to these effects because in psychometric distributions they are concealed by the conjoint effects of cue–target confusions and processing rate changes.

Highlights

  • Attention is believed to selectively speed up processing

  • The results showed that prior entry was more than twice as large when measured with temporal-order judgments (TOJ) compared to the secondary task

  • R now is a greater partition than P, and the reference is encoded at a higher rate, as we found in the cue onset asynchrony” (COA) = 140 ms condition of Experiment 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The resulting effect is known as “prior entry,” the earlier perception of a stimulus to which attention is directed compared to an unattended one, all else being equal. Prior entry is frequently investigated with temporal-order judgments (TOJ; e.g., Shore et al, 2001; Scharlau et al, 2006; Weiß et al, 2013; Schettino et al, 2016). The DL parameter is an estimate of the discrimination performance. These parameters describe the observed judgments but not the processes that lead to them. This method cannot describe the mechanisms that cause prior entry

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.