Perioperative outcomes in redo VATS for pulmonary ipsilateral malignancy: A single center experience

Abstract

BackgroundThe role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for oncological major pulmonary resections is now well established; however, the literature within pulmonary re-operations is still limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of redo thoracoscopic resections for ipsilateral pulmonary malignancy. MethodsData from patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery at the Unit of Thoracic Surgery of Padua were analyzed, comparing the results between the first and second ipsilateral surgery. The retrospective study included patients who underwent 2 thoracoscopic surgeries for oncological reasons between 2015 and 2022. The variables considered included patients' baseline characteristics, pre, intra, and postoperative data. ResultsThe study enrolled 51 patients undergoing ipsilateral thoracoscopic re-operation. The statistical analysis showed that surgical time (95min vs 115min; p = 0.009), the presence of intrapleural adhesions at second surgery (30 % vs 76 %; p < 0.001), overall pleural fluid output (200 vs 560 ml; p = 0.003), time with pleural drainage (2 vs 3 days; p = 0.027), air leaks duration time (p = 0.004) and post-operative day of discharge (3 vs 4 days; p = 0.043) were significantly higher in the re-operation group.No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups respect to R0 resection rate (90.2 % vs 89.1 %; p=>0.9) and complications (5.8 % vs 15.6 %; p = 0.11).The conversion rate to open surgery was 11.8 %. ConclusionAlthough some differences emerged between the first and second intervention, they had minimal impact on the clinical course of the patients.Therefore, thoracoscopic surgery has been shown to be safe and effective in re-operations with satisfying perioperative outcomes. To achieve such results, these procedures should be reserved for experienced surgeons.