Perioperative and oncological outcomes of uniportal versus three-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy for lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Abstract

With an increasing amount of small nodules being detected, segmentectomy has recently received a great deal of attention. We have previously reported the feasibility and safety of uniportal segmentectomy. This study aims to further compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of uniportal and three-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy in lung cancer patients. Patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy for lung cancer from January 2014 to March 2021 were enrolled. Clinical data were collected from the Western China Lung Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained database at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the heterogeneity in baseline characteristics. Perioperative outcomes, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared. Of the 10,063 lung cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic lung resection, 2,630 patients receiving segmentectomy were selected (uniportal: 400; three-port: 2,230). After matching, similar results were found between the 2 groups (uniportal: 400; three-port: 1,200) regarding the number of lymph nodes harvested, the length of postoperative hospital stays, chest tube drainage volume, and postoperative complication rate. The mean follow-up duration was 27 months. Uniportal regimen showed similar 1- (100% vs. 99.9%, P=0.36), 3- (100% vs. 90.4%, P=0.20), 5-year OS (97.7% vs. 99.4%, P=0.78), as well as PFS, with the three-port regimen. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy is proven to be safe and feasible, and the perioperative outcomes and oncological results were similar between the uniportal and three-port regimens.