Abstract

As one of today’s major oral health issues, periodontal disease affects populations worldwide. Here, methods used to record its past prevalence are reviewed, including the problems associated with the use of measurements to record bone loss. Clinical and bioarchaeological research offers strong support for the Kerr method that records interdental septum morphological changes as a means of identifying gingivitis and periodontal disease. Using Kerr’s approach, four assemblages from Sudan dating to the Neolithic, Kerma and Medieval periods are examined to track the progression of the disease through time. Results show a significantly lower prevalence of periodontal disease and a limited distribution across the mouth in the Neolithic period. Significant differences were found between the sexes at the Medieval sites, which were not present at the Neolithic and Kerma sites. With no patient history and the cumulative effects of a dynamic and episodic disease - only a snapshot of which is captured at death - the concept of ‘oral health’ may be hard to apply in archaeological remains. As suggested by Kerr, it at best provides an insight into the periodontal status at death. Here, this ‘snapshot’ reveals differences across the mouth, over time and between sexes.

Highlights

  • As one of today’s major oral health issues, periodontal disease affects populations worldwide

  • Recent investigations show that both gingivitis and periodontal disease (Global Burden of Disease, 2017) are highly prevalent

  • In nearly every region of the globe, the Community Periodontal Index (CPI), aimed at monitoring periodontal health, shows that 40-60% of 35-44 year olds have small or large periodontal pockets (CPI scores 3 or 4), due to inflammation, loss of attachment of the gingivae and possible bone loss. This is accompanied by a 3560% gingivitis prevalence (CPI scores 1 and 2; [Global Burden of Disease, 2017, p. 2189])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As one of today’s major oral health issues, periodontal disease affects populations worldwide. It assesses differences in the prevalence of periodontal diseases between the Neolithic and Medieval periods in the Middle Nile, if these results vary by sex and age and how this study compares to published data from other archaeological assemblages and modern populations.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call