Abstract

Pathological synchronization in the basal ganglia network has been considered an important component of Parkinson’s disease pathophysiology. An established treatment for some patients with Parkinson’s disease is deep brain stimulation, in which a tonic high-frequency pulse train is delivered to target regions of the brain. In recent years, a novel neuromodulation paradigm called coordinated reset stimulation has been proposed, which aims to reverse the pathological synchrony by sequentially delivering short high-frequency bursts to distinct sub-regions of the pathologically synchronized network, with an average intra-burst interval for each sub-region corresponding to period of the pathological oscillation. It has further been proposed that the resultant desynchronization can be enhanced when stimulation is interrupted periodically, and that it is particularly beneficial to precisely tune the stimulation ON and OFF time-windows to the underlying pathological frequency. Pre-clinical and clinical studies of coordinated reset stimulation have relied on these proposals for their stimulation protocols. In this study, we present a modified ON-OFF coordinated reset stimulation paradigm called periodic flashing and study its behavior through computational modeling using the Kuramoto coupled phase oscillator model. We demonstrate that in contrast to conventional coordinated reset stimulation, the periodic flashing variation does not exhibit a need for precise turning of the ON-OFF periods to the pathological frequency, and demonstrates desynchronization for a wide range of ON and OFF periods. We provide a mechanistic explanation for the previously observed sensitivities and demonstrate that they are an artifact of the specific ON-OFF cycling paradigm used. As a practical consequence, the periodic flashing paradigm simplifies the tuning of optimal stimulation parameters by decreasing the dimension of the search space. It also suggests new, more flexible ways of delivering coordinated reset stimulation.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPeriodic flashing coordinated reset stimulation any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

  • We introduce a modified paradigm, dubbed periodic flashing, in which the timing of the ON-OFF cycles is decoupled from the timing of the stimulation pulse patterns

  • We introduce a novel Coordinated reset stimulation (CRS) paradigm which we call periodic flashing, in which the CR pattern, i.e. the sequence of activation of the stimulation sites, is fixed and operated independently of the ON-OFF “flashing” pattern

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Periodic flashing coordinated reset stimulation any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call