Perineal Urethrostomy for Complicated Anterior Urethral Strictures: Indications and Patient's Choice. An Analysis at a Single Institution

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore indications for a definitive perineal urethrostomy (PU). To objectify the proportion of patients not completing the final stage procedure in an intended multi-stage urethroplasty. To analyze the incentives for both of these scenarios. Materials and MethodsSince 2000, data of all men undergoing urethroplasty at our center have been collected in a database. This study included patients with a definitive PU and patients after ≥1 stages of an intended multi-stage urethroplasty. Patients <18 years or with a follow-up <3 m were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used and groups were compared with nonparametric statistical tests. ResultsAmong 1015 urethroplasties, 34 patients underwent a definitive PU and 63 underwent ≥1 stages of an intended multi-stage urethroplasty with a median (IQR) follow-up of respectively 57 (31-120) and 32 (14-101) months. In the definitive PU group, patients were significantly older (P < .001) and had more cardiovascular comorbidity (P = .01), panurethral stricture disease (P = .02) and longer strictures (P = .02) than patients in the multi-stage urethroplasty group. Half of the definitive PUs were surgeon driven and 33% were patient driven. Final stage procedures were completed by 35/63 (56%) patients. Patients not completing the final stage were significantly older (P = .001). ConclusionDefinitive PU is particularly performed in older patients with worse cardiovascular condition, panurethral stricture disease and longer strictures. PU is often explicitly chosen by well informed patients and as nearly half of the patients refuse closure of the urethrostomy after the first stage, a definitive PU should be proposed as reasonable alternative to complicated urethral reconstruction from the start, especially in older patients.