Abstract

Purpose: We compared outcome of neonates with prenatal and post-natal diagnosis of congenital heart disease presenting in our paediatric heart centre between March 2005 and May 2015 who underwent an emergent intervention within 48 h post-partum.Materials and methods: In 52/111 (46.8%) with emergent intervention, congenital heart disease was diagnosed prenatally, in 59/111 (53.2%) with no specialized foetal echocardiography, diagnosis was made post-natally. In 98/111 (88.2%), 30-day outcome was known.Results: Regarding the entire cohort, 30-day survival did not differ significantly in prenatal and post-natal diagnosis group (71.2 vs. 72.9%; p > .1). Infants with prenatal diagnosis were more likely to be born by caesarean section (59.6% vs. 33.9%, p = .01). Those with post-natal diagnosis had a higher need for intubation (32.7% vs. 52.5%; p < .05). Subgroup analysis of HLH/HLHC (hypoplastic left heart/hypoplastic left heart complex) patients revealed higher number of deaths within 30 days of life in the post-natal diagnosis group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (5/7, 71.4% vs. 5/20, 25.0%; p = .075).Conclusion: For newborns who require emergent neonatal cardiac procedures, our results point towards a lower death rate after prenatal diagnosis of HLH/HLHC.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.