Abstract

BackgroundMany low- and middle-income countries have high levels of violence. Research in high-income countries shows that risk factors in the perinatal period are significant precursors of conduct problems which can develop into violence. It is not known whether the same early influences are important in lower income settings with higher rates of violence. This study compared perinatal and sociodemographic risk factors between Brazil and Britain, and their role in explaining higher rates of conduct problems and violence in Brazil.MethodsProspective population-based birth cohort studies were conducted in Pelotas, Brazil (N = 3,618) and Avon, Britain (N = 4,103). Eleven perinatal and sociodemographic risk factors were measured in questionnaires completed by mothers during the perinatal period. Conduct problems were measured in questionnaires completed by mothers at age 11, and violence in self-report questionnaires completed by adolescents at age 18.ResultsConduct problems were predicted by similar risk factors in Brazil and Britain. Female violence was predicted by several of the same risk factors in both countries. However, male violence in Brazil was associated with only one risk factor, and several risk factor associations were weaker in Brazil than in Britain for both females and males. Almost 20% of the higher risk for conduct problems in Brazil compared to Britain was explained by differential exposure to risk factors. The percentage of the cross-national difference in violence explained by early risk factors was 15% for females and 8% for males.ConclusionsA nontrivial proportion of cross-national differences in antisocial behaviour are related to perinatal and sociodemographic conditions at the start of life. However, risk factor associations are weaker in Brazil than in Britain, and influences in other developmental periods are probably of particular importance for understanding male youth violence in Brazil.

Highlights

  • Childhood behaviour problems and youth violence are major global health problems

  • Prevalence of perinatal and sociodemographic risk factors at birth Newborns in Pelotas were more likely than in Avon longitudinal study of parents and children (ALSPAC) to have been conceived in an unplanned pregnancy, had mothers who smoked in pregnancy, had mothers who had a urinary infection in pregnancy, been born prematurely, had a young and single mother, and had three or more siblings (Table 1)

  • 3 show that the prevalence of conduct problems and violence was higher in Pelotas than in ALSPAC across all categories of risk factors, for both sexes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Childhood behaviour problems and youth violence are major global health problems. In 2010, 5.8 million healthy life years were lost worldwide due to conduct disorder, and 25.5 million lost due to injuries resulting from interpersonal violence (Murray et al, 2012). Research in high-income countries shows that risk factors in the perinatal period are significant precursors of conduct problems which can develop into violence. It is not known whether the same early influences are important in lower income settings with higher rates of violence. This study compared perinatal and sociodemographic risk factors between Brazil and Britain, and their role in explaining higher rates of conduct problems and violence in Brazil. Risk factor associations are weaker in Brazil than in Britain, and influences in other developmental periods are probably of particular importance for understanding male youth violence in Brazil.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call