Abstract

Extrafloral nectaries can occur in both vegetative and reproductive plant structures. In many Rubiaceae species in the Brazilian Cerrado, after corolla abscission, the floral nectary continues to secret nectar throughout fruit development originating post-floral pericarpial nectaries which commonly attract many ant species. The occurrence of such nectar secreting structures might be strategic for fruit protection against seed predators, as plants are expected to invest higher on more valuable and vulnerable parts. Here, we performed ant exclusion experiments to investigate whether the interaction with ants mediated by the pericarpial nectaries of Tocoyena formosa affects plant reproductive success by reducing the number of pre-dispersal seed predators. We also assessed whether ant protection was dependent on ant species composition and resource availability. Although most of the plants were visited by large and aggressive ant species, such as Ectatomma tuberculatum and species of the genus Camponotus, ants did not protect fruits against seed predators. Furthermore, the result of the interaction was neither related to ant species composition nor to the availability of resources. We suggest that these results may be related to the nature and behavior of the most important seed predators, like Hemicolpus abdominalis weevil which the exoskeleton toughness prevent it from being predated by most ant species. On the other hand, not explored factors, such as reward quality, local ant abundance, ant colony characteristics and/or the presence of alternative energetic sources could also account for variations in ant frequency, composition, and finally ant protective effects, highlighting the conditionality of facultative plant-ant mutualisms.

Highlights

  • Ant-plant defensive mutualisms represent an indirect defense strategy widely distributed among angiosperms in which plants provide energetic resources and/or housing for ants that in turn provide protection against herbivores [1,2,3,4]

  • We evaluated plant reproductive success using the rate of initiated fruits, rate of developed fruits and seed set

  • Our results strongly suggest that ants had no effect on plant reproductive success

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ant-plant defensive mutualisms represent an indirect defense strategy widely distributed among angiosperms in which plants provide energetic resources and/or housing for ants that in turn provide protection against herbivores [1,2,3,4]. Extrafloral nectar-visiting ants can protect plants by deterring or preying upon leaf [7, 10], bud and flower herbivores [8, 11,12,13], as well as pre-dispersal seed predators [14, 15]. Some studies have suggested that EFN-visiting ants may be ineffective in plant defense [16,17,18,19,20,21] or even have negative effects by repelling pollinators or the natural enemies of herbivores [16, 22,23,24,25,26]. The net result of these interactions may depend on many factors such as ant density and herbivore abundance [28, 29]; ant behavior [12, 18, 21, 30,31,32]; herbivore vulnerability to ant predation [17, 20, 25, 28, 33, 34]; plant traits and resource abundance [25, 29, 35,36,37,38,39], as well as the local abiotic conditions [32, 40,41,42,43]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call