Abstract

ObjectivesThe present study was performed to comparatively evaluate the peri-implant bone stability and conditions of marginal tissues at 3 years following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation (tSFE and lSFE, respectively).Materials and methodsPatients included in a parallel-arm randomized trial comparatively evaluating tSFE and lSFE were recalled at 3 years post-surgery. Twenty-one and 24 patients in tSFE and lSFE groups, respectively, participated in the follow-up visit. Peri-implant bone support was evaluated as the proportion of the entire implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area (totCON%) on 3-year periapical radiographs. The conditions of the marginal peri-implant tissues at 3-year visit were classified as peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, or peri-implantitis.ResultsAt 3 years, both groups showed an implant survival rate of 100%. Median totCON% was stable at 3 years, being 100% in both groups (p = 0.124). Peri-implant health and mucositis were diagnosed in 10 (47.6%) and 11 (52.4%) patients, respectively, in the tSFE group, and in 8 (33.3%) and 16 (66.7%) subjects, respectively, in the lSFE group (p = 0.502).ConclusionsAt 3 years following surgery, implants placed concomitantly with tSFE and lSFE fully maintain peri-implant bone support. Peri-implant mucositis was the most prevalent condition, with a similar prevalence between groups.Clinical relevance.Based on 3-year data on peri-implant bone support and prevalence of peri-implant diseases, the study suggests that tSFE and lSFE represent two equally valid options for the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02415946.

Highlights

  • Maxillary sinus floor elevation with transcrestal and lateral access are two validated options for vertical bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla

  • Few randomized trials comparatively evaluated the impact of the dimensional reduction of the grafted area on periimplant bone support at a follow-up of at least 2 years following tSFE and lSFE [14, 22]

  • Based on the same cohort, the present study presents data related to (i) peri-implant bone stability and (ii) the conditions of the peri-implant marginal tissues at 3 years following tSFE and lSFE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maxillary sinus floor elevation with transcrestal and lateral access (tSFE and lSFE, respectively) are two validated options for vertical bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Both techniques were associated with high implant survival rates at long-term follow-up intervals [1, 2]. Research Centre for the Study of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. Few randomized trials comparatively evaluated the impact of the dimensional reduction of the grafted area on periimplant bone support at a follow-up of at least 2 years following tSFE and lSFE [14, 22].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call