Abstract

The brain incorporates sensory information across modalities to be able to interact with our environment. The peripersonal space (PPS), defined by a high level of crossmodal interaction, is centered on the relevant body part, e.g. the hand, but can spatially expand to encompass tools or reach targets during goal-directed behavior. Previous studies considered expansion of the PPS towards goals within immediate or tool-mediated reach, but not the translocation of the body as during walking. Here, we used the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) to quantify the extension of the PPS and test if PPS can also expand further to include far located walk-and-reach targets accessible only by translocation of the body. We tested for orientation specificity of the hand-centered reference frame, asking if the CCE inverts with inversion of the hand orientation during reach. We show a high CCE with onset of the movement not only towards reach targets but also walk-and-reach targets. When participants must change hand orientation, the CCE decreases, if not vanishes, and does not simply invert. We conclude that the PPS can expand to the action space beyond immediate or tool-mediated reaching distance but is not purely hand-centered with respect to orientation.

Highlights

  • Various areas of the primate brain are involved in planning and execution of goal-directed reach movements

  • For the tactile discrimination performed in parallel, participants had to discriminate between tactile stimuli presented to index finger and thumb of the reaching hand either before, at or after the onset of movement

  • The congruency effect (CCE) increases with goal-directed reaching behavior even before the hand gets closer to the object suggesting a remapping of the peripersonal space (PPS) to reach goals[24,25,36]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various areas of the primate brain are involved in planning and execution of goal-directed reach movements. We have to plan and execute body movements, e.g. walking, towards this object prior to the reach It is unclear if the same areas contribute to the spatial cognitive aspects of planning goal-directed walk-and-reach movements to near and far located targets. Patients with brain lesions can suffer from visuo-spatial neglect that is selective for the space either near or far from the body, as shown by a line bisection task executed with a pen or by pointing[1,2]. The crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) is the difference in reaction time, or error rate, in the discrimination task with congruent versus incongruent distractors[18] With such a task design, the CCE is spatially restricted and strongest for the space immediately around the hand[19], e.g. when the distractors are placed on the respective fingers next to the vibrators. Previous studies did not test if immediate reaching distance marks the boundary for the peri-hand space or if body movements would allow an expansion even beyond the immediate reachable space

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call