Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on a 3-year follow-up and to compare the value of MCE with demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. Methods: Fifty-eight ESRD patients on regular dialysis were prospectively screened for coronary artery disease (CAD) using perfusion assessment on real-time MCE. We analyzed the following end points during the 3-year follow-up: death, cardiovascular complications, and combined end point, which consisted of adverse cardiac events mentioned above. All features were compared between the two groups with and without perfusion disturbances on MCE. Results: No adverse events related to MCE administration have been observed. Twenty-seven (47%) patients with ESRD demonstrated perfusion defects on MCE. The patients with perfusion defects on MCE comparison with those without perfusion disturbances were older (p = 0.008) and had lower ejection fraction (EF) (p = 0.0001) and higher wall motion index (WMSI) (p = 0.0001). After the 3-year follow-up, the incidence of death (p = 0.00018), cardiovascular end points, revascularizations [both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) p = 0.0016 and p = 0.004, respectively], and composite end point (p = 0.0015) was significantly higher in patients with perfusion defect on MCE. Conclusions: In patients with ESRD, MCE appears to be a safe and useful tool for risk stratification. MCE facilitates decision for coronary angiography.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call