Abstract

To date, critical work on real estate activities and the financialisation of urban development has focused mostly on investor-developer-government interactions to highlight how real estate and investors’ values, expectations and objectives are enacted through regulatory and fiscal reforms, which in turn affects how cities are built. However, less emphasis has been put on the relationship between urban expertise, real estate activities and the production of particular urban forms. Yet, the production of urban knowledge and associated city visions by specific ‘expert’ professions have been shown to influence how cities were planned and built throughout history. Using the redevelopment of King’s Cross Central (London) as a case study, this paper seeks to start addressing this gap, exploring how real estate developers shape the production and use of urban expertise in the context of planning, which in turn influences how cities are planned and built. In doing so, it posits that a renewed emphasis on the politics of expertise and the concept of performativity can help understand how real estate values permeate the built form and are performed in space. More specifically, it demonstrates the pivotal role of real estate developers in articulating and delimiting what constitutes legitimate urban expertise in decision-making regarding large-scale regeneration projects. In addition, it illustrates how the mobilization of calculative techniques and the use of narrow definitions of risks in assessing real estate projects viability and related uncertainties contribute to legitimising the design of planning instruments that enact and perform real estate values.

Highlights

  • City-building since the 1980s has been increasingly driven by real estate activities

  • The mobilization of calculative techniques and the use of narrow definitions of risks in assessing project viability and related uncertainties, contribute to legitimise the design of planning instruments that enact and perform real estate values. This highlights the importance of rethinking the politics of expertise in the context of real estate-led urban development

  • Whilst it is not new to say that the opaque use of financial viability assessments in planning is problematic, tracing how those calculative devices influence the processes through which real estate values are enacted and performed in particular forms of institutional and urban design is important

Read more

Summary

Introduction

City-building since the 1980s has been increasingly driven by real estate activities. The 19th Century Haussmanian plans for the city of Paris, to the post-war modernist projects, up to the contemporary mixed-use regeneration developments, smart city projects, eco-districts and the like, urban trajectories have been shaped by the existence of distinct “ways of” making the city. These developments have been supported by different professions whose “ways of knowing” the city have in turn influenced city-making

Urban experts and urban developments
Background to the case
Methods
Institutional design and rule-making
Systems of experts
Risk definition and financial calculations
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call