Abstract
Performed ethnography and research-informed theatre scripts can be difficult to evaluate. They are hybrid texts created by practices that have evolved in two different worlds each with multiple ways of evaluating the strengths and limitations of individual projects. In this article, I use Laurel Richardson's five criteria for evaluating “creative analytic practices” as a framework to assess the strengths and limitations of my latest research-informed play Harriet's House. In doing so, I hope to illustrate how the framework might be used by other playwrights and researches to assess both their own and other people's performed ethnography and research-informed theatre projects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
