Abstract
Information systems (IS) users are being increasingly included in the evaluation of IS staff performance; however, unless there is agreement on the importance and selection of performance measures, interpretation and implementation of such evaluation is confounded. Differences in job duties and educational background between IS users and IS staff members lead us to expect differences in up-front task importance and in subsequent evaluation of IS staff job performance. An instrument is developed to study seven aspects of IS staff performance evaluation from IS staff and user perspectives. Gaps are confirmed in a study with a sample of 100 IS users and 93 IS staff members. Techniques for reaching agreement are suggested based on improving communication and understanding of common measures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
