Abstract

Fund managers in the South African unit trust industry have an objective of generating strong alpha returns, meaning average annual returns above the respective benchmark. This paper analyses the performance of twenty South African unit trusts, selected from various sectors over the 1998 – 2002 period. In all cases the benchmark used by the funds is the Johannesburg Stock Exchange All Share Index. The well-known Capital Asset Pricing Model and a three-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory model are used in the analysis. The result shows that only four funds of the twenty analysed were able to generate a superior performance in one or more years of the five-year period. Individual unit trusts were unable to perform consistently for any length of time. The failure of the funds to meet their objective is further analysed in terms of the appropriateness of the JSE All Share Index as the benchmark. In some cases the index was not an appropriate benchmark to measure persistence in performance and sector indices were preferable. In a cross-sectional portfolio analysis there was evidence of overall persistence in performance but this was of short duration, related more to negative than positive persistence in performance. Overall, the results of the analysis do not produce convincing evidence that unit trust fund managers were able to generate consistent above average returns to their investors. Furthermore, it may be preferable from an investor’s viewpoint if fund managers were to target an absolute rather than a relative benchmark.

Highlights

  • Investors expect superior returns from actively managed unit trusts to justify management fees and expenses incurred

  • Consideration is given to the suitability of the benchmark adopted by fund managers to measure the performance of their funds

  • Throughout the paper performance is attributed to ‘fund managers’ but no attempt is made to find out to what extent the management team has changed during the period under consideration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Investors expect superior returns from actively managed unit trusts to justify management fees and expenses incurred. This paper attempts to ascertain whether there have been funds that outperformed their benchmark and if fund managers have been able to achieve persistent superior returns for their investors. If the fund managers have not been able to meet these expectations the incentive for investing in such funds is considerably weakened. Consideration is given to the suitability of the benchmark adopted by fund managers to measure the performance of their funds. If an inappropriate target is set extraneous economic events may cause managerial performance to be misjudged. Throughout the paper performance is attributed to ‘fund managers’ but no attempt is made to find out to what extent the management team has changed during the period under consideration

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call