Abstract

ABSTRACT— This study investigated the relationship between 3 ability‐based cognitive styles (verbal deductive, spatial imagery, and object imagery) and performance on geometry problems that provided different types of clues. The purpose was to determine whether students with a specific cognitive style outperformed other students, when the geometry problems provided clues compatible with their cognitive style. Students were identified as having a particular cognitive style when they scored equal to or above the median on the measure assessing this ability. A geometry test was developed in which each problem could be solved on the basis of verbal reasoning clues (matching verbal deductive cognitive style), mental rotation clues (matching spatial imagery cognitive style), or shape memory clues (matching object imagery cognitive style). Straightforward cognitive style–clue‐compatibility relationships were not supported. Instead, for the geometry problems with either mental rotation or shape memory clues, students with a combination of both verbal and spatial cognitive styles tended to do the best. For the problems with verbal reasoning clues, students with either a verbal or a spatial cognitive style did well, with each cognitive style contributing separately to success. Thus, both spatial imagery and verbal deductive cognitive styles were important for solving geometry problems, whereas object imagery was not. For girls, a spatial imagery cognitive style was advantageous for geometry problem solving, regardless of type of clues provided.

Highlights

  • This study investigated the relationship between 3 ability-based cognitive styles and performance on geometry problems that provided different types of clues

  • In order to understand the nature of cognitive style and its implications for mathematics education, it is essential to situate this research within the framework of the latest theories and research in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience (Kozhevnikov, 2007)

  • There was no consistent relationship between students who were high or low scorers on the spatial imagery cognitive style measure and high or low scorers on the verbal reasoning cognitive style measure

Read more

Summary

Published Version Citable link Terms of Use

ABSTRACT—This study investigated the relationship between 3 ability-based cognitive styles (verbal deductive, spatial imagery, and object imagery) and performance on geometry problems that provided different types of clues. Researchers have found that higher level visual areas of the brain are further divided into two functionally and anatomically independent systems: one concerned with appearance of individual objects and the other with spatial relations among objects and components of objects (Kosslyn & Koenig, 1992; Levine, Warach, & Farah, 1985; Ungerleider & Mishkin, 1982) Both neuroscience and behavioral studies have documented that object (shape–based) and spatial types of processing rely on different mechanisms (Baddeley, 1986; Kozhevnikov, Kosslyn, & Shephard, 2005; Logie, 1995; Ungerleider & Mishkin, 1982). The cognitive style–clue-compatibility hypothesis would predict that spatial imagers should perform more effectively than object imagers or verbalizers on geometry problems that include spatial imagery clues Gender is another person-specific factor that may affect the match between cognitive style and geometry clue. More males than females may have a spatial imagery cognitive style (and gender may be an intervening factor) when considering spatial imagery cognitive style and geometry performance

METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call