Performance of Two Industrial Dryers for Fish Feed

Abstract

Performance and energy efficiency of two types of dryers for fish feed are compared. The first dryer was a belt dryer located at a fish feed production facility in Norway. The second dryer was a counterflow multideck dryer at a fish feed production facility in Chile. In both dryers there was only a slight decrease in drying rate over the dryer. Product samples showed a standard deviation of 0.45% on an average moisture content of 10.2% (wb) for the belt dryer and 0.49% on an average of 8.6% (wb) for the counterflow dryer. Mass and heat balances showed good accuracy. In order to compare the energy use of both dryers, normalized energy consumption and efficiency were calculated for equal feed and air inlet temperatures using two methods: the primary energy method and the energy difference method. The average normalized specific energy consumption for the belt dryer was 3,386 kJ/kg water evaporation (primary energy method) and 2,970 kJ/kg (energy difference method), with efficiencies of 56 and 64%, respectively. For the counterflow dryer the average specific energy consumption was 2,893 kJ/kg (primary energy method) and 2,393 kJ/kg (energy difference method), with efficiencies of 70 and 85%, respectively.