Abstract

Various commercially available nociception devices have been developed to quantify intraoperative pain. The Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) and Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) are among the analgesic indices that have been widely used for the evaluation of surgical patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of the SPI and ANI in conscious healthy volunteers and parturients. Ten healthy volunteers and 10 parturients participated in this study. An algometer was used to induce bone pain in the volunteers until they rated their pain as five on the numerical rating scale (NRS); this procedure was repeated during the administration of remifentanil or normal saline. The study comprised two periods, and the volunteers were infused with different solutions in each period: normal saline during one period and remifentanil during the other in a randomized order. The parturients’ SPI and ANI data were collected for 2 min when they rated their pain levels as 0, 5, and 7 on the NRS, respectively. Both the SPI and ANI values differed significantly between NRS 0 and NRS 5 (P < 0.001) in the volunteers, irrespective of the solution administered (remifentanil or normal saline). At NRS 5, the SPI showed similar values, irrespective of remifentanil administration, while the ANI showed significantly lower values on remifentanil administration (P = 0.028). The SPI and ANI values at NRS 5 and NRS 7 did not differ significantly in the parturients (P = 0.101 for SPI, P = 0.687 for ANI). Thus, the SPI and ANI were effective indices for detecting pain in healthy volunteers and parturients.

Highlights

  • Various commercially available nociception devices have been developed for the quantification of intraoperative pain (Ledowski, 2019)

  • Sixty sets each of Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) and Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) measurements obtained from the 10 volunteers were analyzed

  • The SPI values were similar for numerical rating scale (NRS) 5, irrespective of remifentanil administration, whereas the ANI values were lower for NRS 5 during remifentanil administration (P = 0.028)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various commercially available nociception devices have been developed for the quantification of intraoperative pain (Ledowski, 2019). If the intensity of the pain felt by the patient is the same, irrespective of analgesic administration, analgesic indices that show similar values for measurements performed in conditions with and without analgesic administration will be more useful. This is because pain management is performed according to the pain score in actual clinical practice [e.g., numerical rating scale (NRS)], which is calculated according to the rating provided by the patient. The performance of these indices should be evaluated using well-controlled volunteer studies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call