Abstract

This paper describes the thinking behind the development of an improved tool to measure the performance of the postsecondary system in Ontario. The rationale is relevant to other jurisdictions. Ontario’s public higher-education system consists of 24 community colleges and 20 universities and constitutes 40% of higher-education enrolments in Canada. HEQCO has a legislated mandate to conduct performance assessments of the postsecondary sector and to make these evaluations public. In contrast to the approach of others who use a broad range of performance indicators, we are developing a performance measurement tool with a very limited number of indicators that are tied directly to the high priority goals of the Ontario government and that are designed to assess the effectiveness and impact of government policies and actions (e.g., tuition, financial aid, funding formulas, institutional differentiation). The instrument will measure system performance, not that of individual institutions (or their ranking). This approach, which measures only what matters, forces definition and measurement of the most relevant, meaningful and revealing measures. The indicators address equity of access, sustainability of institutions and academic quality, the three highest priorities for the postsecondary system in Ontario. The indicators selected reflect outcomes and impact, not inputs. Academic quality was the domain hardest to measure but our bias was to measures that are direct, embedded, meaningful to students and government, and validated by the institutions. We describe significant research trials we are currently conducting to determine the best and most efficient ways of obtaining these academic quality measures that, in our view, should form the centrepiece of any instrument that purports to measure the performance of a higher-education system or institutions.

Highlights

  • Canadian governments, under greater scrutiny and facing demands for more accountability over the use of public funds, are applying increasing pressure to measure the performance of their public higher-education systems

  • As Jim Collins, author of Good to Great, observed: “If you have more than three priorities, you don’t have any” (Collins 2001)

  • Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) was established by legislation in 2005 (Government of Ontario 2005) “to assist the Minister in improving all aspects of the postsecondary education sector, including improving the quality of education provided in the sector, access to postsecondary education and accountability of postsecondary educational institutions.”

Read more

Summary

Why Performance Measurement Is Important to Canada

Under greater scrutiny and facing demands for more accountability over the use of public funds, are applying increasing pressure to measure the performance of their public higher-education systems. Governments recognize that the outputs of higher-education systems—the highly educated students they graduate, the research and innovation they spawn and the communities they support —are essential to a robust and vibrant society that is competitive economically and that sustains a high quality of life. This is especially true in Canada where the higher-education system is essentially public.

The Pragmatist Versus the Idealist
Equity of Access
Sustainable Institutions
Findings
What Is Left to Be Done?

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.