Abstract

BackgroundThe automatic measurement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) constitutes a reliable, simple, safe, rapid, and inexpensive alternative diagnostic screening test compared with the Doppler method for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of automatic ABI measurement tests to Doppler ultrasound for PAD in a group of patients aged 65 years and above, in Sub-Saharan Africa. MethodsThis was an experimental comparative study of the performance of Doppler ultrasound to the automated ABI test in the diagnosis of PAD in patients aged ≥ 65 years followed-up at the Yaoundé Central Hospital, Cameroon between January to June 2018. An ABI threshold < 0.90 is defined as a PAD. We compare the sensitivity, and specificity of the high ankle-brachial index (ABI-HIGH), low ankle-brachial index (ABI-LOW), and the mean ankle-brachial index (ABI-MEAN) for both tests. ResultsWe included 137 subjects with an average age of 71.7 ± 6.8 years. In the ABI-HIGH mode, the automatic device had a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 98.35% with a difference between the two techniques of d = 0.024 (p = 0.016). In the ABI-MEAN mode, it had a sensitivity of 40.63% and a specificity of 99.15%; d = 0.071 (p < 0.0001). In the ABI-LOW mode, it had a sensitivity of 30.95% and a specificity of 99.11%; d = 0.119 (p < 0.0001). ConclusionThe Automatic measurement of systolic pressure index has a better diagnostic performance in the detection of Peripheral Arterial Disease compared to the reference method by continuous Doppler in sub-Saharan African subjects aged ≥ 65 years.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call