Abstract

BackgroundRapid, easy, economical and accurate species identification of yeasts isolated from clinical samples remains an important challenge for routine microbiological laboratories, because susceptibility to antifungal agents, probability to develop resistance and ability to cause disease vary in different species. To overcome the drawbacks of the currently available techniques we have recently proposed an innovative approach to yeast species identification based on RAPD genotyping and termed McRAPD (Melting curve of RAPD). Here we have evaluated its performance on a broader spectrum of clinically relevant yeast species and also examined the potential of automated and semi-automated interpretation of McRAPD data for yeast species identification.ResultsA simple fully automated algorithm based on normalized melting data identified 80% of the isolates correctly. When this algorithm was supplemented by semi-automated matching of decisive peaks in first derivative plots, 87% of the isolates were identified correctly. However, a computer-aided visual matching of derivative plots showed the best performance with average 98.3% of the accurately identified isolates, almost matching the 99.4% performance of traditional RAPD fingerprinting.ConclusionSince McRAPD technique omits gel electrophoresis and can be performed in a rapid, economical and convenient way, we believe that it can find its place in routine identification of medically important yeasts in advanced diagnostic laboratories that are able to adopt this technique. It can also serve as a broad-range high-throughput technique for epidemiological surveillance.

Highlights

  • Rapid, easy, economical and accurate species identification of yeasts isolated from clinical samples remains an important challenge for routine microbiological laboratories, because susceptibility to antifungal agents, probability to develop resistance and ability to cause disease vary in different species

  • BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:234 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/234 tion is very much demanded in addition to mere detection, because susceptibility to antifungal agents, probability of resistance development and ability to cause disease vary in different species [3]

  • Since the recommended 0.3 μl volume of crude colony lysates added into McRAPD reaction mixture did not always provide satisfactory results with all the species included in our study, we first optimized this volume

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Easy, economical and accurate species identification of yeasts isolated from clinical samples remains an important challenge for routine microbiological laboratories, because susceptibility to antifungal agents, probability to develop resistance and ability to cause disease vary in different species. A profound change can hardly be expected in the foreseeable future except for rapid detection of selected yeasts species in specific types of samples, blood in particular. This is mainly because only the identification techniques based on pure culture examination are able to identify the whole spectrum of potentially pathogenic yeast species reliably. For reviews on phenotyping- and genotyping-based systems see [4,5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call