Abstract
Rapid antigen tests are commonly used by clinicians for rapid, simple, point-of-care testing. Five rapid antigen tests were shown to have low sensitivity (40.3-58.8%) when compared to real-time RT-PCR using nasal wash specimens from patients with influenza-like-illness (N = 167) that were collected previously and confirmed as 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)-positive by PCR. Rapid antigen test sensitivity correlated with virus levels in nasal secretions when comparisons were made to cycle threshold (C(T)) values obtained from real-time RT-PCR. When C(T) values are <25 (equating to viral concentrations of >10(4) TCID(50)/ml) sensitivity for all five rapid antigen kits was high (range: 83-94% positive); however, when C(T) values are >30 (10(2) TCID(50)/ml), sensitivities of only 16-18% were observed for four of five rapid antigen kits. The Directigen EZ Flu A + B test detected more positive samples (35%) at lower viral concentrations with C(T) values >30 when compared with other commercial kits (P = 0.05). Rapid antigen test results must be interpreted with caution, and negative specimens may need confirmation by sensitive molecular assays.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
