Performance of fine-needle aspirate testing compared with superficial swab testing for quantification of BPV-1/−2 viral load in equine sarcoids

Abstract

Bovine papillomavirus (BPV) types 1 and 2 are causally associated with equine sarcoid, the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of horses, but the viral load (VL) differs between lesions. Sensitive and accurate BPV detection and quantification is essential for clinicians to confirm clinical suspicion, as well as in research settings for stratifying these skin lesions. Due to the limitations of histopathology in sarcoid diagnosis, PCR screening of superficial swabs constitutes the principal sampling method for BPV detection. This study aimed to investigate the ability of superficial swabs and fine-needle aspirates (FNA) to accurately detect the VL in equine sarcoids, considering the main clinical types: occult, nodular, verrucous and fibroblastic. Superficial swabs and FNAs from a series of sarcoid-affected horses were tested in parallel for BPV DNA quantification. Quantitative real-time PCR screening of postoperative tissue biopsies served as reference standard for the accuracy assessment of the viral titters. Our results indicate that VL is not a predictor of the clinical type. Student's t-test results gave evidence of a significant difference between both sample methods (P < 0.001) with FNA giving the best approximation of the actual VL (P < 0.01). In contrast to superficial swabs, the reference standard correlated moderately with FNA in general (P < 0.05; r = 0.39) and strongly with FNA results within the occult sarcoid group (P < 0.05; r = 0.59). In conclusion, the correlation of FNA with the reference standard was strong enough to suggest this is the preferred method for quantifying VL in sarcoids.