Abstract
TWO systems for real-time animal identification, one using a battery-powered ear tag transponder and one using a passive transponder hung around the neck, were installed in the stalls of a milking parlor. The performance of the systems over a period of 5 months was analyzed. The rates of correct identifications were 87.6% for the neck tag system and 93.5% for the ear tag system. An analysis of malfunctions showed that rates of 93.2% for the neck tag system and 98.1% for the ear tag system were possible. The estimated minimum acceptable rate for commercial systems was 98%
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
